‘Increasingly, we become so secure in our bubbles that we accept only information, whether true or not, that fits our opinions, instead of basing our opinions on the evidence that’s out there.’
Barack Obama during his farewell address
Obama uses the word ‘bubble’ to refer to a situation that is isolated from reality, in which you only experience opinions you agree with, or people who are similar to you.
Do you see any evidence of this in people today? To what extent do you feel you live in a ‘bubble’?
The friends of the paralysed man took extreme measures to get him in front of Jesus! What does this say about their expectations of what Jesus would do?
Jesus’ first response wasn’t what they were expecting (verse 5). How might the paralysed man and his friends have reacted to what Jesus said? How might Jesus’ words have challenged their understanding of what was most important?
Mark doesn’t record the response of the paralysed man. Instead, he focuses on the reaction of the religious scholars who were present in the crowd.
Blasphemy means making a mockery of God, and religious people see it as one of the worst sins. Why were the teachers of the law so offended by Jesus’ words?
Consider Jesus’ question to the Pharisees (verse 9). How did Jesus demonstrate his authority to do what only God can do? What do you make of this claim?
The next controversy is over Jesus’ social circle. Tax officials worked for the Roman occupiers in taxing their fellow Jews. As a result they were hated as traitors to their people and to God. Furthermore, they were well known for their corruption and greed.
In that society, sharing a meal was of deep social significance. Every religious Jew knew who they were allowed to eat with and who they weren’t. What point was Jesus making by eating with Levi and his friends (verse 17)?
Why do you think it mattered to the Pharisees who Jesus was friends with?
Jesus’ reply had a strong hint of sarcasm. How was he challenging the Pharisees’ attitudes?
The next dispute arises because Jesus and his friends are not fasting like other groups. People fasted to show they were sorry for their sin, in the hope that God would forgive them and restore his favour. Jesus’ response is at first puzzling and then shocking in its implications…
One of the most daring images used in the Jewish Bible to describe God’s relationship with his people was that of a loving husband separated from an unfaithful wife. Despite their repeated betrayals, God had promised to one day forgive his people and restore the relationship forever:
‘“In that day,” declares the Lord, “you will call me ‘My Husband’ … I will betroth you to me forever”’ (Hosea 2:16 and 19).
Considering this background, what might Jesus be claiming about himself in verse 19?
Jesus follows this with two images highlighting the mistake of trying to make new things fit in with old worn-out structures (verses 21–22). What point could Jesus be making to his religious critics?
The next issue is the Sabbath. This was a Jewish holy day, which involved complete rest from work. This day of rest each week was meant to be a foretaste of a future time when hardship, suffering and sadness would end and the world would experience true rest forever.
For the Pharisees, however, the Sabbath had become, like fasting, yet another way of proving themselves to God. In the story before this (Mark 2:23–28) Jesus had boldly claimed to be ‘Lord of the Sabbath’. Was he the one who would at last bring true rest to a hurting world?
Jesus is reluctant to be known as a miracle worker (see study A), yet this healing is both very public and deliberately controversial. What reasons might Jesus have had for healing on the Sabbath?
The Pharisees refuse to answer Jesus’ question (verse 4). How does Jesus respond to their silence?
Jesus’ challenge to the Pharisees results in their making plans with the political authorities (the Herodians) to see Jesus destroyed. Jesus was saving a life; they were plotting to kill.
How would you summarise what Jesus is claiming about himself through these snapshots? Why do you think it was so hard for the Pharisees to accept?
Jesus was exploding the categories and expectations of his day. By forgiving sins and welcoming those seen as unholy, Jesus was doing what only God had the right to do. By replacing fasts with feasting and using the Sabbath for healing, Jesus was refocusing humanity’s hopes for a better world upon himself. The Pharisees could see what was at stake. It just couldn’t be true. Jesus had to be silenced.
What do you think is the difference between honest doubt about new ideas and a stubborn reluctance to change one’s beliefs?
How would Jesus challenge your own beliefs and priorities, if what he claimed were true?
The gospels are full of people telling their stories - people asking questions, seeking relationships, searching for something more.
A central character, woven throughout each story, is Jesus, a historical figure surrounded by mystery. Join us as we explore these stories, and build up a picture of Jesus through the people he meets and the accounts that are written about him.